Hi writers,
I’ve been
thinking about vulnerability in writing, one of those hard-to-define qualities
that is invisible but can make or break a story. In my earliest writing,
readers complained that there was not enough vulnerability, I think because I
as the writer wasn’t comfortable yet with the idea. But guarded and jaded
characters, like guarded and jaded people, are really hard to get to know. And
in life, we may take the time and be rewarded … but in reading, if we cannot
love or at least understand a character, we are ultimately not going to care.
An argument for going a bit soft, maybe?
Elisabeth
PROCESS: CREATING
SOFT SPOTS
When describing a character, either real or fictional, it is
necessary to reveal what they do not like, do not know, cannot forgive, or
cannot reveal in themselves. Good writing places scenes that reveal these vices
alongside scenes that reveal virtues.
Try this: Consider making a pros and cons list of your
character’s qualities, trying to make them of equal length, and focusing
especially on qualities that, depending on the light, are both pros and cons. Jot down notes about ways you
might reveal these qualities in action.
FEATURED VENUE: CAMAS
“Deeply
inspiring” is what Terry Tempest Williams has called Camas, a literary journal based in the Environmental Studies
Graduate Program at the University of Montana. Until October 15, Camas is
seeking writing and photography that explores the idea of “work.”
Submission guidelines here: http://umt.edu/camas/Submit.aspx
PROMPT
“They became friends after…” (8min)
No comments:
Post a Comment